Tech Explained: E20 petrol

There has been a lot of discussion around E20 fuel being rolled out across India. One side says it is cleaner and better for emissions. Another side says it hurts mileage. I wanted to look at the cleaner-fuel claim from a science point of view just for my understanding as there is lot of misinformation around.

The useful question is simple. Cleaner in what sense?

E20 can be cleaner if you are talking about some local pollutants from the exhaust. It looks less dramatic if you are talking about tailpipe CO₂ per km. It can look better again if you use lifecycle carbon accounting, where farming, fertilizer, irrigation, distillation, transport, and fuel production are included.

E20 means petrol blended with 20% ethanol by volume. Ethanol still burns to produce CO₂ and water. It has less carbon per litre than petrol, but it also has less energy per litre. A good rule of thumb is that ethanol carries about 65% of petrol’s energy per litre. So E20 is 20% ethanol by volume, while ethanol contributes only about 14% of the fuel energy.

This is where many claims become confusing. If a certain ethanol pathway has 50% lower lifecycle emissions than petrol, the full E20 blend does not become 50% lower carbon. Only a fraction of the fuel energy is coming from ethanol, so the blend-level climate benefit becomes much smaller. For tailpipe CO₂ per km, the saving is also limited because lower carbon per litre is partly offset by lower energy per litre. Mileage drops.

The stronger case for E20 is local pollution. Ethanol has oxygen in the molecule, so it can help reduce carbon monoxide, soot & particulate matter. The tradeoff is that acetaldehyde can increase, especially during cold start, and NOₓ depends on engine design and catalyst behaviour.

Based on all of this, it is surprisingly easy to make E20 look either extremely good or completely pointless depending on which metric you choose to highlight. So before accepting any claim about E20 being cleaner or dirtier, the first question should be: cleaner in which unit, and measured across which boundary?

Once you ask that question, most of the confusion around E20 starts to disappear and you can take an informed decision.

If you liked the post, Share it with your friends!

Tech Explained: BLE 6.3 Inline PCT Transfer

Bluetooth 6.3 spec was released a couple of weeks back, and I finally got time yesterday to go through the changes. The most interesting one is Inline PCT Transfer. Lets discuss that today.

I had written about Channel Sounding for distance measurement in older posts. In that, 2 BLE devices exchange known radio tones and watch how the phase shifts across frequencies. That phase shift carries distance information, so it can do better than signal-strength guessing.

Now the tricky part is the oscillator error. Each device has its own local oscillator. When the reflector receives a tone, the measured phase mixes the useful air-path phase with the phase difference between the two oscillators. Earlier, the reflector reported Phase Correction Term(PCT) data back. It used I and Q values, which describe amplitude and phase. The initiator combined its own phase reading with the reflector’s data and cancelled the oscillator error digitally.

BLE 6.3 moves that correction closer to the radio itself. With Inline PCT Transfer, the reflector looks at the phase of the tone it received and uses that information to shift the phase of the tone it sends back. So instead of sending all the correction details to the initiator for later math, part of the correction is built into the returned signal.

When that signal comes back, the initiator gets a cleaner phase measurement. It effectively sees the phase change from the signal travelling to the reflector and coming back again, so the useful channel phase appears doubled. That is helpful because the initiator needs less extra PCT data over HCI, which is the interface between the Bluetooth host and controller. So what’s the use case? Less reported data means less processing, less procedure time, and potentially lower power for repeated ranging.

The other BLE 6.3 changes are useful too. PHY-specific RTT accuracy improves timing and BR/EDR RF limits are relaxed for dual-mode radio design. Overall 6.3 is a good update.

If you liked the post, Share it with your friends!
1 2 3 4 5 21