Back to Basics: Auto Balancing Bridge Circuits

I was reading up for a client project on impedance measurements. While digging through, I ran into the auto-balancing bridge circuit used inside many LCR meters, and it’s worth understanding.

In the simplest form, impedance is just Z = V/I. You drive the DUT with a sine, measure the voltage across it, measure the current through it, and then divide. The problem is that an AC ammeter is never ideal. Its input impedance, wiring, and stray capacitance start affecting what you measure.

The auto-balancing bridge avoids measuring current directly. Check the images. Circuit forces the DUT current Ix to flow through a known range resistor Rr using a feedback amplifier. The Low terminal is driven to a virtual ground, close to 0V. Now the current becomes a voltage Vr across Rr, so Vr = Ix * Rr. You also measure Vx across the DUT. Put those together and you get Zx = Vx / Ix = Rr * (Vx / Vr). The instrument is really doing a vector ratio(Vx / Vr).

This setup would use two vector voltmeters, one for Vx and one for Vr, then take the ratio. The catch is there can be mismatch between meters. So many LCR meters instead switch one voltmeter receiver between Vx and Vr, so the same front end measures both and tracking error largely cancels.

Below about 100 kHz, an op-amp transimpedance stage can hold the Low node near 0V and convert Ix into Vr. Above that, bandwidth limits and parasitics make the balance drift. So instruments add a null detector that senses leftover error current, split it into 0° and 90° parts, and drive a vector modulator to tweak amplitude and phase until the error goes to zero. That closed-loop correction is the auto in auto-balancing. BTW, its called auto-balancing because the instrument doesn’t rely on you to manually “balance a bridge” like old Wheatstone-style bridges. It uses a feedback loop that continuously drives the error toward zero on its own.

You use this circuit for getting your impedance U curves for capacitors, ferrite beads etc to a particular freq limit. For very high freqs (GHz), you often switch to network analysis/VNA methods.

If you liked the post, Share it with your friends!

Back to Basics: 3 Terminal Capacitors – Part 2

Since last week’s post got many of you interested in 3 terminal capacitors, I thought we should discuss a bit more on this. Quick reminder: In a 3 terminal capacitor your power rail/signal enters one end, exits the other, and the ground electrode sits in the middle. Many parts look like 4 pads because the ground is split into two pads that are the same node.

So, how to place them in circuits? There have been a lot of combinations that have studied on how to use the GND vias. Check images. Those two ground pads are not optional. If you connect only one side to ground, you bring back the same loop problem you were trying to fix. When you stitch both sides into a solid ground plane, the return paths are shorter, the loop area is smaller, and the magnetic fields partially cancel. ESL is reduced due to mutual induction effects when current flows from the centre of the component to the left and right sides. You will see suppression values much lower in this case.

Your PCB stackup also matters in these things. You need to have the GND plane as close to the signal layer possible because the via is shorter and inductance is smaller. The number of ground vias matters too. App notes show that two vias, one on each side of the ground pattern, gives better attenuation than a single via, and shallow vias beat deep vias at the same count. Via-in-pad can help if your fab allows it. A ground via placed in the middle of the split ground pads will reduce ESL too.

This is also why these parts can reduce component count. If your fix today is using three or four 0.1µF caps scattered around a boundary, a single well grounded 3 terminal part placed at the boundary can often replace the whole cluster and behave more predictably at high frequency.

Murata and TDK have great app notes with mounting drawings and measured curves, and they are worth going through before you commit to a footprint. I really do think for high speed designs, you should start considering them if you are not already using it.

If you liked the post, Share it with your friends!
1 2 3 4 5 73